The Contestation of Profanity and Sacral at Taman Bungkul Landscape

Rohma Tunurus Asholiha; Lina Puryanti

doi:10.59373/drs.v1i1.4

Authors

Rohma Tunurus Asholiha Universitas Airlangga Surabaya
Lina Puryanti Universitas Airlangga Surabaya, Jawa Timur Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59373/drs.v1i1.4

Keywords:

Culture, Borders, Bungkul, Profane, Sacred

Abstract

Since its inauguration in 2007, the development of Bungkul Park has been very conspicuous from a tomb to a tourist attraction. As a historical place, Bungkul Park is not as famous as Wali Songo. Geographically, the tomb of Sunan Bungkul and the green open space's Bungkul border the wall to distinguish the location's layout. This place is better known as a recreational place. Changes in function are more creative than religious. This study tries to answer (1) How is the Sacred culture that occurs in religious tourism? (2) How is the Profan culture in the bungkul ParkPark? (3) What is the impact of cultural differences in religious tourism in Sunan Bungkul and Bungkul Park? These problems are explained by analyzing the data and sources obtained through the stages of qualitative descriptive research methods, which include ethnography, criticism, interpretation, and historiography. Based on the data analysis and sources received, the development of Bungkul Park, which is getting better, brings the Surabaya city government to revitalize Bungkul Park. The City Government should pay more attention to the religious aspect than the profane aspect of using Bungkul. This is because of Bungkul's care, most of which pays more attention to the ParkPark than his burial. Visitors are also more familiar with the ParkPark than bungkul's tomb.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Afriansyah, R. (2018). Fungsi Taman Bungkul Surabaya. http://journal.unair.ac.id/download-fullpapers-aunfbf9984c45full.pdf

ALFIANITA, I. L. (2018). Oral History Sejarah Makam Sunan Bungkul Kota Surabaya Repository - Unair Repository. https://repository.unair.ac.id/69328/

Badiyah, M. (2016). Taman Bungkul Tahun 2007-2015. https://jurnalmahasiswa.unesa.ac.id/index.php/29/article/view/14856/13441

Bungin, B. (2007). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif.

Carr, S., Stephen, C., Francis, M., Rivlin, L., & Stone, A. (1992). Public space.

Donnan, H., & Wilson, T. (2021). Borders: Frontiers of identity, nation, and state.

Dukut, I. W. (n.d.). Dukut Imam Widodo. 2008. Hikajat Soerabia Tempo Doeloe.... - Google Cendekia. Retrieved January 11, 2022, from https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=id&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=Dukut+Imam+Widodo.+2008.+Hikajat+Soerabia+Tempo+Doeloe.+Surabaya%3A+Dukut+Publishing.&btnG=

Faisal Reza. (2011). Taman Bungkul Surabaya (Studi Deskriptif Tentang Keberadaan Taman Bungkul Surabaya Sebagai Salah Satu Taman Rekreasi Masyarakat Di Surabaya. https://repository.unair.ac.id/18588/

G. H. von Faber. (1931). Oud Soerabaia. De geschiedenis van Indië’s eerste koopstad van de oudste tijden tot de instelling van den Gemeenteraad. Gemeente Soerabaia.

Hanif, M. (2016). Kesenian Dongkrek (Studi Nilai Budaya Dan Potensinya Sebagai Sumber Pendidikan Karakter). Gulawentah:Jurnal Studi Sosial, 1(2), 132–141. https://doi.org/10.25273/GULAWENTAH.V1I2.1036

Hurd, E. S. (2021). Border Religion. At Home and Abroad, 228–246. https://doi.org/10.7312/HURD19898-014/HTML

IRMADELLA, A. (2018). Model Kolaborasi Stakeholders Dalam Pengelolaan Ruang Terbuka Hijau (Rth) Taman Bungkul Kota Surabaya. https://repository.unair.ac.id/72513/

Martinez, O. J. (n.d.). Martinez, O. J. (1994). Border people: Life and society... - Google Cendekia. Retrieved January 11, 2022, from https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=id&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=Martinez%2C+O.+J.+%281994%29.+Border+people%3A+Life+and+society+in+the+US-Mexico+borderlands.+University+of+Arizona+Press.&btnG=

Mibtadin, M. (2016). Masyarakat Sakral Dan Masyarakat Profan: Pemikiran Sosiologi Durkheim dan Relevansinya dalam Konteks Keberagaman di Indonesia. SMART, 2(01), 1. https://doi.org/10.18784/SMART.V2I01.301

Muhammad, N. (2013). Memahami Konsep Sakral dan Profan dalam Agama-Agama. Substantia: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Ushuluddin, 15(2), 266–278. https://doi.org/10.22373/SUBSTANTIA.V15I2.4900

Mustaqim, M. (2016). Metode Penelitian Gabungan Kuantitatif Kualitatif/Mixed Methods Suatu Pendekatan Alternatif. Intelegensia : Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.34001/INTELEGENSIA.V6I1.1351

Navisah, F. (2011). Implementasi Kebijakan Peraturan Daerah Kota Surabaya Nomor 17 Tahun 2003 Tentang Penataan Dan Pemberdayaan Pedagang Kaki Lima Di Taman Bungkul.

Pranoto Suhartono. (2021). Teori dan metodologi sejarah.

Puryanti, L., Wacana, S. H.-, & 2011, undefined. (n.d.). A people-state negotiation in a borderland: A case study of the Indonesia–Malaysia frontier in Sebatik Island. Brill.Com.

Rofik, M. A. (2017). Pendekatan ilmu sosial dalam historiografi Indonesia menurut perspektif Sartono Kartodirdjo: kajian terhadap buku pemberontakan petani Banten 1888. http://repository.um.ac.id/91451/

Rosaldo, R. (2003). Cultural citizenship in island Southeast Asia: Nation and belonging in the hinterlands.

Rosyidah, A. P. (2019). Taman kota dan Perubahan Sosial (Studi Rostow dan Parson dalam Perkembangan Masyarakat di Taman Bungkul Surabaya) - Digilib UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya. https://digilib.uinsby.ac.id/29385/

Shihab Quraish. (2007). Secercah Cahaya Ilahi: Hidup Bersama Al-Quran.